If you are thinking of taking anabolic steroids there are many things you might want to take into consideration. Side effects, such as acne, high blood pressure, liver problems, sexual problems with certain steroids, testicular shrinkage, hair loss. Most of these can be controlled with other substances, such as liver protectants and hcg. Also the anabolic steroids are illegal, and you can face up to 5 years in prison if convicted.
STEROIDS USED IN PRO WRESTLING
He is famous as the wrestler Hulk Hogan. But today, Terry Gene Bollea was a subdued and sad-faced man as he testified in the Federal trial of his former employer, Vincent K. McMahon, the wrestling promoter charged with illegally providing steroids to the wrestler-performers in his World Wrestling Federation.
Gone were the screaming yellow muscle T-shirt and the manic persona of the charismatic Hulkster. Mr. Bollea, his long blond hair spilling over the collar of a dark business suit, answered questions somberly as the Government tried to show that Mr. McMahon's Titan Sports Corporation had illicitly provided him with anabolic steroids. Defense lawyers, in cross-examination, sought to show that Mr. Bollea's nearly 14-year use of the drugs had been an entirely personal action. Prosecutors have charged that Mr. McMahon provided steroids to his wrestlers to build up their physiques and thus make them more appealing to audiences.
The mainstay of drug therapy for bacterial pneumonia is antibiotic treatment. The choice of agent is based on the severity of the patient's illness, host factors (eg, comorbidity, age), and the presumed causative agent. Although intravenous (IV) penicillin G is currently not favored, doses in the range of 20-24 million U/d result in serum levels that exceed minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) levels of most resistant pneumococci. Glucocorticoids
The role of glucocorticoids in acute bacterial pneumonia is not yet clear. Classic teaching warns that the use of glucocorticoids in infection may impair the immune response. However, findings show that local pulmonary inflammation may be reduced with systemic glucocorticoids. In the future, these drugs may be a useful adjunct in the immunocompetent patient. In one study, routine use of oral prednisone in bacterial pneumonia showed no benefit.[70] Outpatient/inpatient antibiotic administration
Outpatients are given oral agents, and, for the most part, parenteral medications are given to admitted patients. This rationale does not preclude the clinician from giving an initial IV dose of antibiotics in the emergency department and then sending the patient home on oral agents, if the patient's condition warrants such action. The patient's condition, infection severity, and microorganism susceptibility should determine the proper dose and route of administration.
A rational approach may be to administer an oral extended-spectrum macrolide or amoxicillin and clavulanate (Augmentin) to those with mild, outpatient disease. Oral fluoroquinolone may be substituted if a comorbidity or allergy to the first-line agents is present or for good dosing compliance. Admitted patients should receive IV therapy, a third-generation cephalosporin alone or with a macrolide. An alternative regimen would be IV fluoroquinolones. Pediatric antimicrobial therapy
All agents discussed in the next sections are for use in persons older than 5 years. In children younger than 5 years, initial treatment of pneumonia includes IV ampicillin or nafcillin plus gentamicin or cefotaxime (for neonates), and ceftriaxone or cefotaxime can be administered as a single agent (for >28 d to 5 y). An alternative regimen includes a penicillinase-resistant penicillin plus an antipseudomonal aminoglycoside.
Outpatient treatment of mild-to-moderate pneumonias in children usually involves agents similar to those used for acute otitis media. Most of the pneumonias in these patients probably have a viral cause. In children who have features suggesting a bacterial etiology (eg, an infiltrate on chest radiograph and/or positive findings at sputum Gram staining), the administration of antibiotics may be good clinical practice. In these cases, many clinicians begin empiric therapy with amoxicillin, but its spectrum of activity is lacking, because children in this group who do not have nonviral pneumonia usually have an infection caused by S pneumoniae and Mycoplasma species.
H influenzae type B has been less common since the introduction of the HIB vaccine. Children younger than 2 years may still be at risk for H influenzae type B infection, because their immune response is not sufficient, as it is in older children. A typical regimen for outpatient therapy may include a new macrolide agent or a second-generation or third-generation cephalosporin. Cost is a potential drawback for all agents. Macrolides
The best initial antibiotic choice is thought to be a macrolide. Macrolides provide the best coverage for the most likely organisms in community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CAP). Macrolides have effective coverage for gram-positive, Legionella, and Mycoplasma organisms. Azithromycin administered intravenously may be an alternative to intravenous erythromycin.
Macrolides, as a class, have the potential disadvantage of causing gastrointestinal (GI) upset. Compared with erythromycin, newer agents have fewer GI adverse effects and drug interactions, although all macrolides have the potential for drug interactions similar to those of erythromycin. Newer macrolides offer improved compliance because of reduced dosing frequency, improved action against H influenzae, and coverage of Mycoplasma species (unlike cephalosporins). The main disadvantage is cost.
Macrolides are primarily recommended for the treatment of CAP in patients younger than 60 years who are nonsmokers without comorbidity. Give special consideration to recommendations for antibiotic use in patients with comorbidity or those with CAP who are older than 60 years. Although patients in this group are still susceptible to S pneumoniae, they should receive treatment for broader coverage that includes Haemophilus, Moraxella, and other gram-negative organisms. Therefore, a prudent course of action for empiric outpatient therapy is to include: (1) one of the macrolide agents described previously plus a second- or third-generation cephalosporin or amoxicillin and clavulanate or (2) trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) as a single agent.
Patients who have moderate clinical impairment or comorbidity are best treated with parenteral agents and, unless a particular agent is strongly suspected, broad coverage should be afforded. Regimens for this use include a macrolide plus a second-generation or third-generation cephalosporin, (as single agents) Ampicillin and sulbactam (Unasyn), piperacillin and tazobactam (Zosyn), or ticarcillin and clavulanate (Timentin). Cephalosporins
Second-generation cephalosporins maintain the gram-positive activity of first-generation cephalosporins, provide good coverage against Proteus mirabilis, H influenzae, E coli, K pneumoniae, and Moraxella species, and provide adequate activity against gram-positive organisms.
Of these agents, cefprozil, cefpodoxime, and cefuroxime seem to have better in vitro activity against S pneumoniae. Second-generation cephalosporins are not effective against Legionella or Mycoplasma species. These drugs are generally well tolerated, but cost may be a factor. Oral second-generation and third-generation cephalosporins offer increased activity against gram-negative agents and may be effective against ampicillin-resistant S pneumoniae.
Third-generation cephalosporins have wider activity against most gram-negative bacteria (eg, Enterobacter, Citrobacter, Serratia, Neisseria, Providencia, Haemophilus species), including beta-lactamase–producing strains.
Intravenous cephalosporins may be combined with a macrolide agent. They broaden the gram-negative coverage, and in the case of third-generation agents, they may be effective against resistant S pneumoniae. In addition, some third-generation agents are effective against Pseudomonas, whereas second-generation agents are not. Combination drugs
The combination of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) may be used in the patient with pneumonia and a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or smoking. It may be also used as a single agent in younger patients in whom a Haemophilus species is the suspected agent.
TMP-SMZ is well tolerated and inexpensive. However, allergic reactions are more often associated with drugs in this class than with other antibiotics. Reactions span the spectrum from simple rash (most likely) to Steven-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis (rare). Many potential drug interactions are noted.
When a severely ill patient has features of sepsis and/or respiratory failure, and/or when neutropenia is known or suspected, treatment with an intravenous macrolide is combined with an intravenous third-generation cephalosporin and vancomycin. An alternative regimen may include imipenem, meropenem, or piperacillin and tazobactam plus a macrolide and vancomycin. A fulminant course also must raise the suspicion of infection with Legionella or Mycoplasma species, Hantavirus, psittacosis, or Q fever.
Fluoroquinolones, including levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and gatifloxacin, may also be used. These agents are available in oral and parenteral forms and have convenient dosing regimens, which allow easier conversion to oral therapy that results in good patient compliance. Note that in July 2008, a warning was issued from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regarding the risk of tendonitis and tendon rupture with fluoroquinolone use
If you’re lucky, you might not be familiar with the term “payday loan”. A payday loan is supplied by a third-party lender and it is supposed to help consumers get out of last-minute financial jams by offering a cash advance on an upcoming paycheck. While getting out of a tough spot is certainly a good thing, the interest charged by payday lenders typically surpasses 100%, which could make a tough spot even tougher. So, are payday loans a great service for those who need them, or are they an example of loan shark companies preying on peoples’ desperation?
Why wait for payday?
A payday loan works like this: You’re short on cash and can’t wait until your next paycheck comes around, so you head off to your local payday lender (some of whom are even online these days), and ask to set up a payday loan–usually somewhere between $50 and $1,000, although the higher limits are usually harder to qualify for. You write a post-dated check for that amount plus the fees you now owe to the lender. You get your money right then and there and, when payday rolls around, the lender will cash your check and collect its profit.
Typically, people who use payday loans find themselves in situations where they are presented with few other financial alternatives. In their eyes, a payday loan is a way of staying afloat for a short period of time without having to ask for handouts. People with low credit or no credit are ideal customers for payday lenders. (To learn more, see “The Importance Of Your Credit Rating”) In Pictures: 10 Ways To Improve Your Credit
One Step Forward, Two Steps Back
In most cases, a payday loan is not an attractive option for short-term financial problems. Exorbitant interest charges, sub-par lender reliability, small loan size, future dependency and the possible negative effects that borrowing from these lenders can have on your credit rating are all valid reasons to avoid a payday loan if at all possible. (For related reading, see “Are You Living Too Close To The Edge?”)
The amount of interest charged by payday lenders is no joke. Annualized interest of between 200% and 500% are the industry standard. Payday lenders are often able to get around usury laws–government limits on the amount of interest a lender can charge–by calling their interest charges “service fees”, which aren’t subject to the same regulations as interest fees are in many places. (To learn more about loan interest and how to calculate it, read “APR Vs. APY: How The Distinction Affects You”.)
Special Offer: Last month, Lawrence McMillan recommended Foster Wheeler June $50 calls for $5. They now trade near $24. Click here for more high payoff and high-percentage trades in the Option Strategist.
Above the Law
Many states have usury exemptions for loans made by foreign entities or lenders incorporated outside the borrower’s state. When a state won’t accept the “service charge” loophole, lenders will often take advantage of this by setting up shop in places with no restrictions on the amount of interest they can charge. A lender in South Dakota, where there is no usury limit, can make a loan to someone in California, where usury restrictions do exist, by taking advantage of this trick. The excessive interest charged by payday lenders is illegal in many places, including Canada, where usury is technically limited to 60%, although the Canadian government has yet to step in to enforce the law. Of late, many states have been taking steps to bar payday lenders from operating within their borders. In general, payday lenders tend to be less reputable than their commercial bank counterparts. In an industry where documentation is paramount, payday lenders can require borrowers to provide personal financial and identification information as part of their approval process. Because payday loans provide big profits for lenders without many requirements for professional credentials, a lack of information security and potential for fraud are also troubling aspects of payday loans.
Paltry Sums
With all the detractors from the payday loan, the size of most payday loans seems of little consequence. But when you consider the fact that most payday lenders won’t typically authorize anything more than $400, their usefulness–particularly if someone is concerned about keeping up car or mortgage payments–really comes into question. The small loans act in the lenders’ favors in more ways than one: Smaller loans means more borrower diversification because spreading money over more customers means less risk. Also, limiting loans to small amounts can often disguise just how extreme the interest rates are.
Learning to Live Without
Another major risk that goes along with payday loans is the risk of dependency. While a payday loan might get you through the end of the month, will the interest charged on the loan make things even more difficult for you the following month? A cycle of dependency like this can cripple a person’s financial health. If this is the case, taking out a payday loan can have a lasting impact on your ability to get credit in the future. As payday loans become more commonplace and are being handled by more established companies, some payday lenders are starting to report to credit bureaus. Given the precarious nature of most payday borrowers’ finances, defaulting on your payday loan could mean a lasting scar on an already weak credit score.
Better Alternatives
Payday loans are not the only solution to short-term liquidity problems. If you need money and you find that collateral and credit aren’t major problems, a conventional loan is the best-case scenario. If taking out a personal loan isn’t a realistic possibility, asking your employer for a pay advance or going to online lending communities like Prosper.com can be a way of avoiding a payday loan. Despite the old adage that warns against borrowing from friends and family, you might want to consider it over resorting to taking out a payday loan–especially considering the payback options put you in a deeper hole. (For related reading, check out “Getting A Loan Without Your Parents”.)
Conclusion
Resorting to a payday loan is often a worst-case scenario but you may find that it’s your only option. If this is the case, it’s important to weigh your options and reflect on all your facts before you enter into a financial agreement that’s probably stacked in the house’s favor. You can also work toward building yourself an emergency fund, so that you’ll have money available if disaster strikes. In a sticky situation, it could be the best solution of all.
The Department of Defense spent more than a half a million dollars on the male enhancement drug Viagra last year, according to government contracts.
The Washington Free Beacon reports the Pentagon issued 60 contracts worth $504,816 for the drug in 2014. All 60 contracts were awarded to Cardinal Health Inc., a pharmaceutical distribution company based in Dublin, Ohio.
Last year, the department also ordered $3,505 worth of Levitra, and $14,540 of Cialis, other popular erectile dysfunction drugs.
The contracts were filed under “Troop Support.”
The department began offering Viagra to soldiers as a medical benefit in 1998, when the drug cost $10 a pill. Due to inflation, one pill now costs $25. At the time the military’s policy only allowed for six pills a month per patient, and the department said they would “not replace lost or stolen pills.”
The Department of Defense (DoD) spent more than a half a million dollars on the male enhancement drug Viagra last year, according to government contracts.
The Pentagon issued 60 contracts worth $504,816 for the drug in 2014. All 60 contracts were awarded to Cardinal Health Inc., a pharmaceutical distribution company based in Dublin, Ohio.
Last year DoD also ordered $3,505 worth of Levitra, and $14,540 of Cialis, other popular erectile dysfunction drugs.
The contracts were filed under “Troop Support.”
DoD began offering Viagra to soldiers as a medical benefit in 1998, when the drug cost $10 a pill. Due to inflation, one pill now costs $25. At the time the military’s policy only allowed for six pills a month per patient, and the DoD said they would “not replace lost or stolen pills.”
“Defense guidelines allow military physicians to prescribe Viagra only after a thorough evaluation indicates the medication as the optimal regimen for the patient,” a release outlining the Pentagon’s policy said. “Patients prescribed Viagra also receive careful guidelines for taking the medication. According to defense health officials, Viagra side effects may include headaches, flushing of the face or chest, indigestion, nasal congestion and mild vision impairment.”
“There’s also no guarantee Viagra will work,” DoD added.
Viagra is still covered by TRICARE, the military’s health insurance system, as well as “External vacuum appliances,” or penis pumps, “penile implants and testicular prostheses,” and hormone injections to treat Erectile Dysfunction.
According to a Washington Free Beacon analysis, at $25 a pill, the amount of Viagra purchased by the Pentagon could have led to up to 80,770 hours, 33 minutes, and 36 seconds of sexual enhancement, assuming that no erection lasted more than the medically advised 4 hour maximum.
Viagra is the brand name for sildenafil, a prescription drug used to treat erectile dysfunction (ED).
Sildenafil belongs to a class of medications called phosphodiesterase inhibitors, which work by increasing blood flow to the penis during sexual activity, resulting in an erection.
However, Viagra will not work without sexual stimulation.
Manufactured by Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Viagra was originally conceived as a treatment for hypertension and cardiovascular disease, until researchers found it produced erections.
In 1998, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved it as the first pill to treat impotence (now known as erectile dysfunction), and in 2005 it approved sildenafil for the treatment of PAH.
Viagra has been prescribed "off-label" to treat Raynaud's disease, in which the fingers and toes become cold and numb, and, in combination with doxorubicin, to treat prostate cancer.
Sildenafil, under the brand name Revatio, is also prescribed to men and women with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) to improve their ability to exercise and decrease shortness of breath.
Viagra Warnings Don't take Viagra if you're taking nitrate drugs for chest pain or heart problems. This mix can cause a sudden and serious drop in blood pressure, making you feel dizzy and faint, and possibly bring on a heart attack or stroke.
(Be aware that some recreational drugs, such as amyl nitrate or "poppers," also contain nitrate.)
Alpha blockers such as Hytrin (terazosin) and Flomax (tamsulosin HCI) combined with Viagra can also result in a drop in blood pressure.
Make sure you're healthy enough to have sex before taking Viagra — talk to your doctor about any heart disease or heart rhythm problems, as sex puts extra strain on the heart.
Viagra for Women The FDA has not approved Viagra as a treatment for sexual dysfunction in women, although an increasing number of studies have found that it could boost libido and sexual arousal in some women.
Pregnancy and Viagra While the FDA has not approved Viagra for sexual dysfunction or low libido in women, women taking Revatio, which has the same active ingredient as Viagra, for PAH, should tell their doctor if they are pregnant or plan to become pregnant.
Viagra is in FDA Pregnancy Category B, meaning it's not expected to harm a fetus, but no adequate studies have been carried out in pregnant women to prove it.
It's not known if sildenafil is excreted in breast milk. Ask your doctor if it’s safe to breastfeed while taking Viagra.
“Come here and you see the Palestinian with the Jew, altogether,” explains Mohamed Barhum, the Arabic general manager at Israeli firm Sodastream’s controversial factory in the occupied West Bank.
“There is no discrimination,” he tells mirror.co.uk. “Peace is starting from here - I believe this. Peace is starting from autonomy, not from the political.”
Last month Hollywood actress Scarlett Johansson dramatically quit her role as an ambassador for Oxfam as the row over her decision to sign as a face for Sodastream escalated.
The fizzy soft drink firm, who have a store in the UK in Brighton, Sussex and an annual net income of £32 million, have faced mounting criticism for operating their main production plant in the disputed settlement of Ma’ale Adumim.
Oxfam, along with other fiece critics of Israeli settlement policy, claim Sodastream denies Palestinian workers basic rights, and keeps them trapped in poverty.
But Mohamed Barhum - along with the other Palestinian and Israeli Arab employees mirror.co.uk spoke to during a visit to the plant - did not seem to agree with the company’s outspoken critics.
We were allowed to freely walk around the factory, which employs nearly 500 Palestinians, and 250 Israeli Arabs in a workforce totalling 1300.
The average worker is paid around £1000 a month - three times more than Palestinian workers earn elsewhere in the West Bank.
Nasser, 29, said he had been with the company for two years, and revealed he worked a 12 hour shift in which he was given 90 minutes break time - and that bosses did not deduct time from breaks during Muslim prayer breaks.
Another worker seemed critical of the campaign groups around the Palestinan BDS (Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions) movement - who call for a worldwide boycott of goods manufactured in the Israeli settlements.
“We are here peacefully and we have no problems,” said Mohammed Youseff, 22. “Everyone is complaining about settlements here and everywhere, but SodaStream is different.
“We get paid well here. More than three times what other Palestinians do. Some of other go on to buy houses and make a future for our families. I don’t want this to end.”
Sodastream Chief Operating Officer Yossi Azarzar and his advisor Maurice Silber spoke proudly of the company’s commitment to equality.
“Israeli workers and Palestinian workers are paid the same wage for the same jobs,” confirmed Silber. “We work together, we eat together, and we pray together.
“I believe everyone should feel equal here, whether they are Jew, Palestinian or Israeli Arab, Russian or Ethiopian.
“As you can see it is not just Israeli Jews who can go on and become managers and progress in the company. Anyone can.”
The decision to locate Sodastream’s main plant inside the controversial West Bank settlement was made by the company’s previous owner during the 1990’s.
Azarzar said the location had actually turned out to be a “pain in the ass.”
He insisted if the site became part of a new Palestinian state they would be happy to pay taxes in the new nation.
Azarzar added: “Everyone is against the (Israeli) occupation - but just because Sodastream operates here does not mean we violate human rights.
“Who knows, Sodastream could become the future seed of the Palestinian economy.”
Changing the clocks signals the ideal time to start incorporating some of Spring’s hottest trends into your career wear now. There are plenty of ways to make it work regardless of current weather conditions. It’s as simple as integrating one spring-like piece to rejuvenate your corporate, creative, or casual wintry work look.
Here are some ideas to get you started and fast-forward transitioning your winter workwear into Spring today:
Simply pair a pastel blouse, sweater, or blazer (more sizes) with your go-to neutral black, gray, and navy trousers or your dark wash denim jeans. Love this blouse too! Brights will be a big Spring trend as well, but I haven’t found anything office appropriate that I felt was worthy of your attention yet.
Update your outerwear with a drapey trench coat or a tried-and-true classic version. Both are on trend and available in a variety of colors this Spring season. I went for traditional khaki and got this one after trying several brands. Note its weight is heavier than most, because of the dense twill weave. Also I simply had the extra long belt altered to be shorter for a few bucks. Pay special attention to materials, because many of the lightweight cotton trench coats in the marketplace right now easily wrinkle. If that is the look you’re going for, then you’ll have plenty of options. Otherwise, look for dense cottons, lyocell, polyester, viscose, or elastane blends. More trench coat ideas here, here, here, here, and here.
Swap your wintry boots for trendy d’Orsay flats or pumps. Lots of colors to choose from for Spring. You’ll find additional versatile nude and black ones here, here, here, and here at varying heel heights.
Change-out your dark handbag for a white or pastel satchel. Rebecca Minkoff has designed a beautiful sorbet bag collection this season. More styles here. You may wish to try a casual caramel bucket bag too. Another favorite here.
Pair a light or dark chambray shirt underneath your traditional suiting or even try pairing the pant or skirt with a chambray jacket.
Wear bright white with your winter neutrals like gray, black, or navy. Try one of these bright white tops here, here and here or try this blazer or jeans.
It is a little early for this Spring trend, but modern, minimalist sandals are already selling out fast. Love these low-heel versions of last year’s über popular Schutz heels. And these flats really caught my eye too. Those with block heels are fun, flattering like these, these, these & these, and oftentimes, provide additional comfort & support. Available in a variety of colors, but I again chose to focus on versatile neutrals.
Add Spring seasonal prints into the mix. Tops are the simplest route. I fell for this ikat print blouse. It is super flattering. Try a mini dot one or a dark floral one too. Opt for a striped tee, blouse, or tunic top. Wear a lacey short or long sleeved top.
Include a utility jacket (aka. anorak or field jacket) in your transitional wardrobe. Wear on Casual Friday’s or weekends. I prefer the ones with stand collars, because they gently frame the face. Available in multiple colors this season. I chose this classic utility jacket in olive, but if you want one that covers your backside this BR one is a better option. Also really liked this style too.
Q: What are the best anabolic steroid for women? Are Anavar and Primobolan the best bets to minimize masculinizing side effects?
A: It may seem surprising but IMO Anadrol (oxymetholone) is a good choice for women who wish to be conservative yet have very effective results.
I don’t specialize in cycles for women and don’t choose to involve myself with it — it almost only happens when the wife of someone I’m working with wants to use some anabolic steroids as well — but I haven’t seen 25 mg/day in divided doses go wrong yet.
Medically, you’d be astonished at the doses women and even girls have taken with very low virilization rates. So anyway, contrary to what intuition might suggest, Anadrol is not one of the riskier choices for women.
That aside, 15 mg/day of Anavar (oxandrolone) will be virilizing in quite a few cases. Probably about 5 mg/day of oxandrolone is comparable to 25 mg/day Anadrol (divided doses) for risk.
Primobolan up to 50 mg/week, divided injections, is a common and reasonable choice, but has some risk: not a particularly high rate though.
I first learned of [Anadrol for women] from Dan Duchaine. In the earlier parts of Denise Rutkowski’s career, he had her on 25 mg/day Anadrol. I don’t think I’m disclosing a secret here because he also published this. She obviously did very well with it and at that point she was not virilized at all. So from him mentioning this to me, I looked further into it.
The medical doses are pretty astonishing. The reason that 50 mg is the tablet size is because that’s the standard minimal medical dose, including for women and children! It used to be used extensively for improving red blood cell count.
I’m sure I could find it again, and I’ve posted it before, but there’s at least one paper in the literature reporting doses used for quite a large number of women and reporting low incidence of any side effects. And these doses were often more than 50 mg/day. Sometimes much more.
And further, personally I’ve never seen 25 mg/day go wrong.
I’m not saying it can’t: you see some women developing hoarse voices and facial hair naturally with time, so there must be some women that are right on the edge. But generally speaking, this is a conservative dose, yet quite effective.
The mg amount that women can tolerate of Anadrol is markedly higher than any other anabolic steroid. However, that said, it’s also true that effect per mg is less, but not enough so to make up the safety difference IMO. I would put 25 mg/day Anadrol (in divided doses) up against 50 mg/week Primo any time for effectiveness and it’s at least equally conservative.
Another thing about Anadrol that’s remarkable is that other anabolic steroids are very easily disruptive of the menstrual cycle. Even dosages such as 2.5 mg oxandrolone 2x/day commonly raise issues. Anadrol however medically has shown often only moderate effect on the menstrual cycle at 50 mg/day, and in my too-limited experience with it (as I generally don’t work with women on steroid cycles) 25 mg/day only lightened and shortened the cycles slightly. Remarkably less disruptive.
As a rough rule of thumb: take a dosage that would be quite moderate for a man, nearly the minimum likely to be recommended that could still give reasonable results for a novice, then divide by 10 to have something that’s moderate but effective for a woman.
(I don’t mean effective in the women’s pro bodybuilding sense.)
For each individual steroid, my suggested mild-but-effective dosage range may differ from the above slightly, and of course the above also is only approximate because there will be diffferent opinions as to what would be moderate for a man. But if having nothing else to work with, if you see or are considering a dosage and want to do a quick “reality check,” the above can help. For example, say that someone is proposing EQ at 100 mg/week. Multiply by 10, and our comparison would be to 1000 mg/week of EQ for a man. That’s well above being a mild cycle. So we can see at a glance that this EQ dose is off, without having had to remember specific values for each steroid.
I’d also take Winstrol out of the equation, as it’s possible (I’m not certain) it has a somewhat worse benefits/risk ratio for women than most other anabolic steroids.
Also in general I’d forget stacking for women.
Returning to the stacks you asked about, and in general to anabolic steroids other than Anadrol for women:
I can’t say that it couldn’t possibly be that some stacking method might give better ratio of muscle gain to side effects, but as to whether we know what that is, that’s another question entirely. The best understood uses are single-drug, and single-drug works fine. Primo or Anadrol are my top two choices for bodybuilding and fitness; oxandrolone is also acceptable but must be lower dosed than those two; for quality of life enhancement, very very low dose testosterone works fine.
Anadrol for women?
Is Anadrol an appropriate steroid for women?
FILED UNDER: STEROID ARTICLES TAGGED WITH: ANADROL, ASK BILL ROBERTS, WOMEN
What’s that we see? Is Olivia Pope (Kerry Washington) back in her signature look on last night’sScandal? According to the show’s costume designer, Lyn Paolo–kind of. We’ve been waiting for too many episodes to see our favorite DC fixer back in her element, but Olivia is still facing the dark realities of her recent past and it shows in her wardrobe choices.
RELATED: Get the Style Scoop On Olivia Pope’s Unusual Outfit from Last Night’sScandal
“Even though she looks good in her clothes, she’s still struggling with PTSD,” Paolo tellsInStyle. “We wanted it to be true to how she would be feeling on the inside, so we kept her in dark clothes throughout the whole episode. Even theArmanicoat she wears is from last season. We didn’t want her to be wearing anything new.”
RELATED: The Reason Behind Olivia Pope’s “Slightly Off” Wardrobe
Another instance of dark clothing in this episode comes unexpectedly from First Lady Mellie Grant. She and the rest of the White House team are busy grooming the next Vice President. We see Mellie wearing her favorite red, white, and blues in the beginning of the episode when things are going her way, but a fight with Fitz changes everything up. “We rarely put Mellie in anything that dark, only if she is attending a funeral,” Paolo explains of her black and silverMichael Korsdress. “But she’s wearing dark now because she’s upset with Fitz.”
Next Thursday, tune in to ABC for moreScandal. Then, be sure to check back here for the fashion recap!
